With the experience of direct confrontation in the 33-day war and the weaknesses it had in the “close combat” with the resistance, in the Syrian crisis, the Zionist regime tried to remove the threat from its peripheral area and internal security environment with successive airstrikes on the positions of the resistance and the Syrian army. holds . The numerous air attacks of the Zionist regime on Syrian territory in the past 9 years were first aimed at driving the resistance away from the borders of the occupied Golan, and then by focusing on the Qaim Bokmal crossing on the Iraq-Syria border, it had the intention of challenging the resistance corridor. The Zionist regime escaped from Musqatim’s confrontation with the resistance by targeting Lebanon’s Hezbollah shipments, which had the ability to target directly in the guerilla war based on the “close combat” doctrine. This regime actually intends to push Syria into an anarchic environment with its air strikes and provide security in the middle of its peripheral and internal environment. The Zionist regime considers the basis of its security to be the creation of an anarchic environment and numerous and successive attacks, and it is extremely afraid of guerrilla warfare based on “close combat” with high standards. The following article, by examining the process of the Zionist regime’s attacks in Syria, aims to show that the pattern of the regime’s attacks in Syria is based on distancing the resistance from its internal and peripheral security environment and is trying to get out of the geopolitical suffocation it is trapped in. In the meantime, the resistance must make the internal and peripheral security environment of the Zionist regime a meaningful priority in the asymmetric operations of jihadi groups and pay attention to the preparation of infrastructure.