In the years after the victory of the Islamic Revolution, it was believed that the construction of power and politics in Iran due to the ideological nature of the political system as well as the goals of the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic regarding the defense of Muslims and liberation movements on the one hand and the nature and characteristics of power and politics structure in the region on the other hand, makes it impossible for any management and control of trans-regional powers to be made. However, the type of Iran’s management in regional crises and its authority that emerged in shaping the Islamic Resistance Front showed that Iran has the opportunity and chance to control trans-national powers and even making coalition with them, and if necessary, can take such an approach in its foreign policy. An important example of Iran’s coalition in regional crises is in the Syrian crisis that Iran-Russia agreement brought big changes in the region and even brought global consequences. This agreement showed that the Islamic Republic of Iran is capable of making coalition with the opposition like United States. In spite of all the challenges and considerations, cooperation with Russia in the Syrian case is one example of the Islamic Republic of Iran play in regional and international era, which succeeded in changing the conditions of Syria to the benefit of the resistance front. At the same time, Russia’s cooperation with Iran and Hezbollah in Syria has led to a series of debates on the expansion of Moscow’s ties with the resistance front. Although the term “resistance front” is not well-established for the Russians, and they are more likely to use the term “Shiite Crescent”, which is prevalent in Western and Arabic countries, but in any case, Russia’s close cooperation with the main elements of the resistance front, such as Iran, Syria, Iraq and Hezbollah, puts forward the question “What influence does regional authority of Iran have on the management and control of trans-regional powers, including Russia?”